BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//jEvents 2.0 for Joomla//EN
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:Europe/Paris
BEGIN:STANDARD
DTSTART:20251026T020000
RDATE:20260329T030000
TZOFFSETFROM:+0200
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
TZNAME:Europe/Paris CET
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:STANDARD
DTSTART:20261025T020000
RDATE:20270328T030000
TZOFFSETFROM:+0200
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
TZNAME:Europe/Paris CET
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:STANDARD
DTSTART:20271031T020000
RDATE:20280326T030000
TZOFFSETFROM:+0200
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
TZNAME:Europe/Paris CET
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
DTSTART:20250423T090000
RDATE:20251026T020000
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0200
TZNAME:Europe/Paris CEST
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
DTSTART:20260329T030000
RDATE:20261025T020000
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0200
TZNAME:Europe/Paris CEST
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
DTSTART:20270328T030000
RDATE:20271031T020000
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0200
TZNAME:Europe/Paris CEST
END:DAYLIGHT
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
UID:d497119f72c84478f370179e9f2314e7
CATEGORIES:Journées d’étude, Séminaire du CREM
CREATED:20260118T143744
SUMMARY:World Amplification International Study Day
LOCATION:MSH Mondes (bât. Weber)\, salle 2 (RDC) - 200 avenue de la République\, Nan
 terre\, \, 92000\, 
DESCRIPTION:<p><img src="images/pprouteau/547285538_24374747385479844_88548368646224388
 16_n.jpg" alt="547285538_24374747385479844_8854836864622438816_n.jpg" style
 ="margin-right: 10px; margin-bottom: 10px; float: left;" width="2048" heigh
 t="1152" /></p><p>&nbsp;</p><p><strong>Organized by Pierre Prouteau (LAMC &
 amp; EASt/ULB, CREM, CASE)</strong></p><p><span lang="en-US">Does the sound
  of the world tend to become always more amplified? Why does this feeling s
 tays on the mind like an earworm, sometimes with delight, often with a nega
 tive value attached to it – the nuisance of noise. How has this potentially
  universal tendency to enhance amplification been reinvigorated by electroa
 coustic? The objective of this study day is to address electroacoustic ampl
 ification in its physiological, acoustic, aesthetic, philosophical, technic
 al, moral dimensions—is the pleasure of some, the noise of others, and how 
 is the occupied “volume” negotiated? And its afferent political dimension. 
 The idea is to examine the definitions of sound intensity, its effects on a
 udience perception, and how electroacoustic amplification has impacted alre
 ady-existing repertoires, and contributed to create new ones. Can sound sys
 tems be a weapon in the media arena? As a weapon of the weak or an instrume
 nt of domination?</span></p><h2>Program</h2><p>9h30-10h Coffee</p><h3>I. Mu
 sicians and amplification</h3><p>10h-10h30 Abderraouf Ouertani (<span lang=
 "en-US"><span>member CUNTIC, Univ. of Tunis)</span></span> What amplificati
 on requires: The Impact of Amplification on Oud Practices (and its study)</
 p><p>10h30-11h Sarah Benhaim (Lecturer Univ. of Lorraine) Extreme listening
 : sounds and amplification in noise music</p><p>11h-11h30 Coffee</p><h3>II.
 &nbsp;Theories and measures of amplification (1)</h3><p>11h30-12h&nbsp;Muku
 l Menon (predoc, Univ. Tübingen) Modulating Religiosity: Qualified Amplific
 ation of Sounds, Ideas, and Practices&nbsp;</p><p><span style="background-c
 olor: inherit; color: inherit; font-family: inherit; font-size: 1rem; caret
 -color: auto;">12h-12h30&nbsp;Helma Korzybska (S2HEP, Univ. Lyon 1, member 
 LESC/CNRS, Univ. Paris Nanterre) Redefining “noise”. Amplifications, modula
 tions and redefinitions of auditory perception through cochlear implants</s
 pan></p><p>12h30-14h Lunch Break</p><h3>II. Theories and measures of amplif
 ication (2)</h3><p>14h-14h30&nbsp;Carola Lorea (Professor Univ. of Tübingen
 ) On mantras, picnic parties and car horns: towards a South Asian sonic the
 ory of amplification as auspiciousness</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p><strong>Conclusiv
 e remarks</strong></p><p><span lang="en-US">14h30-15h Pierre Prouteau (LAMC
 , EASt/ULB, CREM, CASE) What is an "amplified society" ?</span></p><p>15h-1
 6h Collective discussion and end of study day</p><p>&nbsp;</p><h2>Abstracts
 </h2><p><strong>Abderraouf Ouertani (<span lang="en-US">member CUNTIC, Univ
 . of Tunis)</span> What amplification requires: The impact of amplification
  on oud practices (and its study)</strong></p><p>This presentation will des
 cribe the impact of the widespread use of electric amplification in the cas
 e of the oud, between constraints (sound degradation, feedback) and advanta
 ges (new sounds, going beyond the strict framework of chamber music). It wi
 ll also be an opportunity to discuss the place of socio-technical phenomena
  related to electric amplification in music studies and to problematise som
 e key concepts in ethnomusicology such as ‘instrument’, “music” and ‘musici
 an’.</p><p><strong>Sarah Benhaim (Lecturer Univ. of Lorraine) Extreme liste
 ning: sounds and amplification in noise music</strong></p><p>Considering lo
 ud sound objects in the field of music invites us to take an interest in th
 e technical means and technologies used to amplify musical productions, but
  also in musical genres that place particular importance on sound volume in
  their creative process and listening modalities. This is the case with noi
 se music, an experimental music that emerged in the early 1980s, which is u
 nique in that it is characterised by noise-based material and sound diffusi
 on conditions that are often considered extreme. I will examine how noise a
 rtists and listeners perceive noise and high-volume amplification aesthetic
 ally and sensorially, based on interviews and recordings from a field study
  conducted in Paris. After a brief review of the centrality of noise in noi
 se music, I will explain how amplification constitutes a noisy mediation fr
 om the point of view of instrumental performance, before showing how it pla
 ys a major role in live listening by promoting an immersive and ecstatic li
 stening experience.</p><p><strong>Mukul Menon (predoc, Univ. Tübingen) Modu
 lating Religiosity: Qualified Amplification of Sounds, Ideas, and Practices
 </strong></p><p>Sound in the context of public, communal, and private piety
  is linked to mediation with the more-than-human and the inscription of ide
 ntity, social relations, and associations with the past. Amplification as a
  tool and a method of augmenting such processes is especially evident in re
 ligious cultures that are based on what has been termed ‘acoustic piety’, t
 hat is, religiosity significantly produced, interpreted, and perceived thro
 ugh sound and in sonic terms. What do differences in sonic and cultural amp
 lification of religious practices in a hierarchical and stratified social e
 nvironment indicate about underlying social phenomena? To explore this idea
 , this paper takes as a case study the popular practice of recitations of t
 he 16th-century text, <em>Addhyātma</em> <em>Rāmāyaṇam</em> <em>Kiḷippāṭṭ,<
 /em> a regional vernacular retelling of the religious epic <em>Rāmāyaṇa </e
 m>in Kerala, South India. Using ethnographic and archival data, it looks at
  how, through the amplification of recitational practices and ancillary act
 ivities- including onsite live and playback performances, congregational so
 nic acts, public sermons, and political speeches in urban and rural context
 s- particular communities, socialities, and spaces are delineated. Modulati
 ons in how ideas and sounds are expanded indicate particularities of cultur
 al transformations and continuities. which are expressed, shared, and felt,
  but also creatively deployed by social agents.</p><p><strong>Helma Korzybs
 ka (S2HEP, Univ. Lyon 1, member LESC/CNRS, Univ. Paris Nanterre) Redefining
  “noise”. Amplifications, modulations and redefinitions of auditory percept
 ion through cochlear implants</strong></p><p>Introducing neurotechnologies 
 into the bodies and perception of people who have lost the ability to hear 
 raises numerous technical, cultural and ethical questions (Mills 2012, Frie
 dner and Helmreich 2012, Lloyd &amp; Bonventre 2020, Bonventre et al. 2023,
  Kecman et al. 2026), nuancing widespread notions of human augmentation. Th
 e learning and rehabilitation process following the surgical implantation i
 s long and strenuous, leaving people with sounding worlds they often find d
 ifficult to interpret and to incorporate. Not only do individuals have to d
 eal with day-to-day technical issues and sensory fluctuations, but they als
 o must learn to manage the cultural gap with the newfound perception.</p><p
 >Using cochlear implants requires different types of adjustments and negoti
 ations, of sensory thresholds, somatic modes of attention, as well as expec
 tations… If “augmenting” perception doesn’t usually translate in a meliorat
 ive sense, some kind of enhancement does operate here. What kinds of amplif
 ications or intensifications are produced or enabled through these stimulat
 ion devices? How are perception and experience amplified in this context?</
 p><p>The technological design and implantation and rehabilitation protocols
  lead to very specific ways of heightening sensations and modes of attentio
 n. This communication proposes to offer insights into the complexity of equ
 ipping perception with technological devices, by focusing on the semantic, 
 sensory, and affective redefinitions of “noise”, as revealed through the el
 ectrode calibration process and negotiations between patients and speech th
 erapists/audiologists observed in a cochlear implantation service in France
 .</p><p><strong><span lang="en-US">Dr. Carola Lorea (Professor Univ. of Tüb
 ingen) On mantras, picnic parties and car horns: towards a South Asian soni
 c theory of amplification as auspiciousness</span></strong></p><p><span lan
 g="en-US">Based on extensive ethnographic research on mantras and sacred so
 und practices in India, this paper develops a preliminary theory of amplifi
 cation as auspiciousness. Drawing on sonic ethnography, I approach amplific
 ation not primarily as a technical operation, but as a culturally and ritua
 lly charged modality of sharing auspiciousness in space. I first demonstrat
 e how amplified sound is widely associated with safety, joy, the assertion 
 of presence, life energy, and positive force. Through everyday and festive 
 soundscapes—such as picnic-season loudspeaker cultures and the affective se
 nsorium of vehicular honking—I show how loudness and sonic expansion are so
 cially experienced as protective, enlivening, and affirming.</span></p><p><
 span lang="en-US">The paper then moves beyond strictly audible sound to exp
 lore forms of non-electroacoustic amplification of unheard auspicious sound
 s. Focusing in particular on spinning and other kinetic practices, I examin
 e how motion itself amplifies mantras—understood as sacred, efficacious for
 mulas—by engaging agentive elements such as wind, fire, electricity, and th
 e human voice. Here, amplification is not only a matter of volume, but of c
 irculation, repetition, and scattering into space, underscoring the insepar
 ability of sound, movement, space, and felt vibration. By bringing together
  loudness, motion, and mantra practice, this paper traces the contours of a
  broader South Asian sonic ideology in which amplification emerges as a cen
 tral mode of producing auspiciousness and of making place.</span></p>
X-ALT-DESC;FMTTYPE=text/html:<p><img src="https://lesc.agerix.org/images/pprouteau/547285538_24374747385
 479844_8854836864622438816_n.jpg" alt="547285538_24374747385479844_88548368
 64622438816_n.jpg" style="margin-right: 10px; margin-bottom: 10px; float: l
 eft;" width="2048" height="1152" /></p><p>&nbsp;</p><p><strong>Organized by
  Pierre Prouteau (LAMC &amp; EASt/ULB, CREM, CASE)</strong></p><p><span lan
 g="en-US">Does the sound of the world tend to become always more amplified?
  Why does this feeling stays on the mind like an earworm, sometimes with de
 light, often with a negative value attached to it – the nuisance of noise. 
 How has this potentially universal tendency to enhance amplification been r
 einvigorated by electroacoustic? The objective of this study day is to addr
 ess electroacoustic amplification in its physiological, acoustic, aesthetic
 , philosophical, technical, moral dimensions—is the pleasure of some, the n
 oise of others, and how is the occupied “volume” negotiated? And its affere
 nt political dimension. The idea is to examine the definitions of sound int
 ensity, its effects on audience perception, and how electroacoustic amplifi
 cation has impacted already-existing repertoires, and contributed to create
  new ones. Can sound systems be a weapon in the media arena? As a weapon of
  the weak or an instrument of domination?</span></p><h2>Program</h2><p>9h30
 -10h Coffee</p><h3>I. Musicians and amplification</h3><p>10h-10h30 Abderrao
 uf Ouertani (<span lang="en-US"><span>member CUNTIC, Univ. of Tunis)</span>
 </span> What amplification requires: The Impact of Amplification on Oud Pra
 ctices (and its study)</p><p>10h30-11h Sarah Benhaim (Lecturer Univ. of Lor
 raine) Extreme listening: sounds and amplification in noise music</p><p>11h
 -11h30 Coffee</p><h3>II.&nbsp;Theories and measures of amplification (1)</h
 3><p>11h30-12h&nbsp;Mukul Menon (predoc, Univ. Tübingen) Modulating Religio
 sity: Qualified Amplification of Sounds, Ideas, and Practices&nbsp;</p><p><
 span style="background-color: inherit; color: inherit; font-family: inherit
 ; font-size: 1rem; caret-color: auto;">12h-12h30&nbsp;Helma Korzybska (S2HE
 P, Univ. Lyon 1, member LESC/CNRS, Univ. Paris Nanterre) Redefining “noise”
 . Amplifications, modulations and redefinitions of auditory perception thro
 ugh cochlear implants</span></p><p>12h30-14h Lunch Break</p><h3>II. Theorie
 s and measures of amplification (2)</h3><p>14h-14h30&nbsp;Carola Lorea (Pro
 fessor Univ. of Tübingen) On mantras, picnic parties and car horns: towards
  a South Asian sonic theory of amplification as auspiciousness</p><p>&nbsp;
 </p><p><strong>Conclusive remarks</strong></p><p><span lang="en-US">14h30-1
 5h Pierre Prouteau (LAMC, EASt/ULB, CREM, CASE) What is an "amplified socie
 ty" ?</span></p><p>15h-16h Collective discussion and end of study day</p><p
 >&nbsp;</p><h2>Abstracts</h2><p><strong>Abderraouf Ouertani (<span lang="en
 -US">member CUNTIC, Univ. of Tunis)</span> What amplification requires: The
  impact of amplification on oud practices (and its study)</strong></p><p>Th
 is presentation will describe the impact of the widespread use of electric 
 amplification in the case of the oud, between constraints (sound degradatio
 n, feedback) and advantages (new sounds, going beyond the strict framework 
 of chamber music). It will also be an opportunity to discuss the place of s
 ocio-technical phenomena related to electric amplification in music studies
  and to problematise some key concepts in ethnomusicology such as ‘instrume
 nt’, “music” and ‘musician’.</p><p><strong>Sarah Benhaim (Lecturer Univ. of
  Lorraine) Extreme listening: sounds and amplification in noise music</stro
 ng></p><p>Considering loud sound objects in the field of music invites us t
 o take an interest in the technical means and technologies used to amplify 
 musical productions, but also in musical genres that place particular impor
 tance on sound volume in their creative process and listening modalities. T
 his is the case with noise music, an experimental music that emerged in the
  early 1980s, which is unique in that it is characterised by noise-based ma
 terial and sound diffusion conditions that are often considered extreme. I 
 will examine how noise artists and listeners perceive noise and high-volume
  amplification aesthetically and sensorially, based on interviews and recor
 dings from a field study conducted in Paris. After a brief review of the ce
 ntrality of noise in noise music, I will explain how amplification constitu
 tes a noisy mediation from the point of view of instrumental performance, b
 efore showing how it plays a major role in live listening by promoting an i
 mmersive and ecstatic listening experience.</p><p><strong>Mukul Menon (pred
 oc, Univ. Tübingen) Modulating Religiosity: Qualified Amplification of Soun
 ds, Ideas, and Practices</strong></p><p>Sound in the context of public, com
 munal, and private piety is linked to mediation with the more-than-human an
 d the inscription of identity, social relations, and associations with the 
 past. Amplification as a tool and a method of augmenting such processes is 
 especially evident in religious cultures that are based on what has been te
 rmed ‘acoustic piety’, that is, religiosity significantly produced, interpr
 eted, and perceived through sound and in sonic terms. What do differences i
 n sonic and cultural amplification of religious practices in a hierarchical
  and stratified social environment indicate about underlying social phenome
 na? To explore this idea, this paper takes as a case study the popular prac
 tice of recitations of the 16th-century text, <em>Addhyātma</em> <em>Rāmāya
 ṇam</em> <em>Kiḷippāṭṭ,</em> a regional vernacular retelling of the religio
 us epic <em>Rāmāyaṇa </em>in Kerala, South India. Using ethnographic and ar
 chival data, it looks at how, through the amplification of recitational pra
 ctices and ancillary activities- including onsite live and playback perform
 ances, congregational sonic acts, public sermons, and political speeches in
  urban and rural contexts- particular communities, socialities, and spaces 
 are delineated. Modulations in how ideas and sounds are expanded indicate p
 articularities of cultural transformations and continuities. which are expr
 essed, shared, and felt, but also creatively deployed by social agents.</p>
 <p><strong>Helma Korzybska (S2HEP, Univ. Lyon 1, member LESC/CNRS, Univ. Pa
 ris Nanterre) Redefining “noise”. Amplifications, modulations and redefinit
 ions of auditory perception through cochlear implants</strong></p><p>Introd
 ucing neurotechnologies into the bodies and perception of people who have l
 ost the ability to hear raises numerous technical, cultural and ethical que
 stions (Mills 2012, Friedner and Helmreich 2012, Lloyd &amp; Bonventre 2020
 , Bonventre et al. 2023, Kecman et al. 2026), nuancing widespread notions o
 f human augmentation. The learning and rehabilitation process following the
  surgical implantation is long and strenuous, leaving people with sounding 
 worlds they often find difficult to interpret and to incorporate. Not only 
 do individuals have to deal with day-to-day technical issues and sensory fl
 uctuations, but they also must learn to manage the cultural gap with the ne
 wfound perception.</p><p>Using cochlear implants requires different types o
 f adjustments and negotiations, of sensory thresholds, somatic modes of att
 ention, as well as expectations… If “augmenting” perception doesn’t usually
  translate in a meliorative sense, some kind of enhancement does operate he
 re. What kinds of amplifications or intensifications are produced or enable
 d through these stimulation devices? How are perception and experience ampl
 ified in this context?</p><p>The technological design and implantation and 
 rehabilitation protocols lead to very specific ways of heightening sensatio
 ns and modes of attention. This communication proposes to offer insights in
 to the complexity of equipping perception with technological devices, by fo
 cusing on the semantic, sensory, and affective redefinitions of “noise”, as
  revealed through the electrode calibration process and negotiations betwee
 n patients and speech therapists/audiologists observed in a cochlear implan
 tation service in France.</p><p><strong><span lang="en-US">Dr. Carola Lorea
  (Professor Univ. of Tübingen) On mantras, picnic parties and car horns: to
 wards a South Asian sonic theory of amplification as auspiciousness</span><
 /strong></p><p><span lang="en-US">Based on extensive ethnographic research 
 on mantras and sacred sound practices in India, this paper develops a preli
 minary theory of amplification as auspiciousness. Drawing on sonic ethnogra
 phy, I approach amplification not primarily as a technical operation, but a
 s a culturally and ritually charged modality of sharing auspiciousness in s
 pace. I first demonstrate how amplified sound is widely associated with saf
 ety, joy, the assertion of presence, life energy, and positive force. Throu
 gh everyday and festive soundscapes—such as picnic-season loudspeaker cultu
 res and the affective sensorium of vehicular honking—I show how loudness an
 d sonic expansion are socially experienced as protective, enlivening, and a
 ffirming.</span></p><p><span lang="en-US">The paper then moves beyond stric
 tly audible sound to explore forms of non-electroacoustic amplification of 
 unheard auspicious sounds. Focusing in particular on spinning and other kin
 etic practices, I examine how motion itself amplifies mantras—understood as
  sacred, efficacious formulas—by engaging agentive elements such as wind, f
 ire, electricity, and the human voice. Here, amplification is not only a ma
 tter of volume, but of circulation, repetition, and scattering into space, 
 underscoring the inseparability of sound, movement, space, and felt vibrati
 on. By bringing together loudness, motion, and mantra practice, this paper 
 traces the contours of a broader South Asian sonic ideology in which amplif
 ication emerges as a central mode of producing auspiciousness and of making
  place.</span></p>
DTSTAMP:20260629T130555
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Paris:20260424T090000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Paris:20260424T180000
SEQUENCE:0
TRANSP:OPAQUE
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR